(September 11, 2016 at 6:25 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote:(September 11, 2016 at 6:04 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: No, it's bad politics. She's supposed to be smart enough to know better than to dig holes.
No it's not.
Romney needed substantial support from the 47% if he were to win the election. Clinton doesn't depend on a single one of the basket of deplorables.
Perhaps you're right ... but I always thought it bad to go after your opponent's followers rather than your opponent directly, it hampers one's ability to peel votes. With the polling as close as it is right now, it's not smart.