RE: 9-11, give me a break.
September 15, 2016 at 4:03 pm
(This post was last modified: September 15, 2016 at 4:08 pm by abaris.)
(September 15, 2016 at 2:00 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: It's unreasonable to assume otherwise seeing how aluminum is 3 times more expensive than steel. IMO You really would only use aluminum in the place of steel if you needed to save weight, but then I don't know a whole lot when it come to building skyscrapers so who knows?
Was 9 11 a conspiracy? Who knows? I know one thing, you'll never find answers if you're not willing to ask questions.
But you know that planes use a considerable amount of aluminium, do you? You also know that planes actually flew into the buildings. I saw the footage the moment it happened. There are certain instances in life where you know exactly where you have been. And I happened to be at my favorite watering hole the moment it happened. It was in the afternoon in the part of Europe I'm based and I had some words with the landlady, since the usual crowd hadn't gathered as of yet.
You also know how many people had to be in the know if this had indeed been a conspiracy? The planes are a fact. Thousands of eyewitnesses and life video footage confirm that. How big would you think the chances be of none of the blowing over a period of 15 years?
Hell, for the sake of argument I give you the planes and let's talk about a controlled explosion at ground zero, as the tinfoily crew claims. How many people are required and how much planning and actual work would be required to bring the towers down? While the towers are still operating as usual, with workers, clerks and employees in them.
How big are the chances of noone crying fire and noone blowing after the fact?
Given all of the above, I go with the vast majority of experts being in agreement on the reasons why the towers fell and what really happened at that day. I give them much more credit than the guys being covered in a tinfoil condome and constantly aske what if without anyone in their right minds taking them seriously.
I watched it when it happened. I sat glued in front of the tv. And I'm saying that as someone who loathed Bush and his cronies with a vengeance.
(September 15, 2016 at 4:02 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Please explain how this molten metal located near the top of this huge skyscraper caused the building to collapse in on itself the way it did? I genuinely want to know.
A demolition team couldn't have done a better job.
Go with the experts if you please. They gave a very comprehensive report starting days after the event. I'm no expert, so I won't repeat anything from the top of my head. But it has been explained. Not a piece of molten metal but several factors coming together. Most of all weight and heat. Structures up high started to collapse and the sheer weight of floors collapsing on each other causing the fall of the towers. That's the layman's recollection. Look up what they said in detail.