Another little tidbit the biased left wing media forgot to mention

[Drich]

It's easy to get all worked up like Drich is. At the same time, the cumulative effect of that bias makes it easy to not notice and easier to dismiss. The liberal bias is subtle but it is definitely there. If you make a big deal out of it though it seems like over reaction.

In this case, though, the issue isn't media bias as a stand-alone.  Drich intimated that only under-the-radar type news outlets covered the story, that liberal media wasn't interested.

Since this is patently false (I'm given to understand that the New York Times is somewhere left of centre) it isn't so much that Drich is getting worked up over liberal bias as it is that he's getting worked up over an instance of bias that does not exist.  This may very well be because Drich is a lunatic.

Boru

False dichotomy:
Aside from the fact you have made claims without ANY citations to back your argument. I have provided a link and a synopsis of two of your sources that show the stories published did not include the elements of the OP you are pretending to be included.

Apples to apples sport, maybe try comparing the two before you take your next victory lap.