(May 23, 2011 at 8:06 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote:
Talk about “parading ignorance”, you logically can’t use small changes to prove common descent. It’s affirming the consequent and is a form of invalid logic. You are just like the guy who says,
1. When I eat pizza I feel full.
2. I feel full.
3. Therefore I ate pizza.
So no matter how hard you try and prove you feel full, this in no logical way proves you ate pizza. No matter how many small changes you point to in animals, it in no way proves that common descent happened. I am sorry to rain on your illogical parade.
That has be be one of the lamest anologies I've ever heard, but you keep on plugging there champ.
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.