7 Animals that are Evolving Right Before Our Eyes

[Statler Waldorf]

So you're comparing two flawed arguments with a valid argument, and calling it flawed, too. The trouble with your idea is that we also have other evidence, such as fossils, to support the idea. A valid scientific theory isn't supported by just one piece of evidence.

It's formal logic. If your argument has the same form as the two invalid arguments (which I demonstrated it does) it is by definition invalid. Remember, it is the structure of the argument that makes it invalid, not the content. The fossil record argument is structured the exact same way, so adding up two invalid logical arguments doesn't somehow give you a valid argument.