Why do the ritors ask for Justice?

[Drich]

Ok sport let's try this..

Hows about you tell me what you think my argument is

Ugh... Well, "sport", since you don't remember:

[...]The fact that you or anyone else does not know the first slave owner in North America was black or that Actual Africans/black people were the primary people who traded in African slave, only further underscores the level of the white guilt movement you have bought into.[...]

and how this contradicts it.

It's horsesh*t. Johnson wasn't the first slave owner in North America. He was merely one of the first slave owners of African origin (black) in America - because up to that point almost all slave owners over there were European white. And sure - the first black slaveholder in America was black. What's your point (if you have one)?

Search Results
The first legal slave owner in America was black and he owned white slaves. Anthony Johnson (BC 1600 – 1670) was an Angolan who achieved freedom in the early 17th century Colony of Virginia. Johnson was captured in his native Angola by an enemy tribe and sold to Arab (Muslim) slave traders.Apr 27, 2015
Did You Know the First Legal Slave Owner in America Was a Black ...
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/.../did-you-know-the-first-legal-slave-owner-in-america-wa...

You see what I did there "Sport?"

I made a statement, backed it against a source, and you responded with essentially "nuh-huh" So then I supplied you with secondary material that supported my first assertion.

So one more time, when I ask you to explain my position I am asking you to address my citations that support my conclusion, meaning if you think I am reading something wrong or if you think my citation is wrong then provide an alternative reading or a stronger citation. don't just repeat your 'nuh-huh.' I get it you disagree, but why do you disagree is the question.

If you think I read the wiki page wrong I included another page that supports my original assessment. So now what else you got?