(September 23, 2016 at 3:35 pm)Thena323 Wrote:(September 23, 2016 at 3:20 pm)Drich Wrote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Jo...(colonist)
Dude was not a preacher sport. he was involved in his church. He was a choir 'man.'
And he had pcp in the car.
The other guy was my only exception. Meaning I said beside the guy who got shot with the autistic man who was hold police at bay with the decipticon/Truck Motor master, was the only innocent man shot.
Guilt or innocence isn't a matter for police officers to determine.
What about this "justice" business you were carrying on about? Respecting the process.
I thought you were all for that.
Again, the primary reason for police interaction is not what is being judged or what is being punished" by a cop shooting someone. It is how an individual is perceived during a confrontation or in an instance where an officer has to subdue or take a person into custody. If a person or a suspect acts aggressively towards an officer (again independently of any crime they may have been accused of) then that action alone warrants the officer to escalated the situation even unto the suspect's/person's death.
Again it's not what got the cop there, for the reason they are allowed to shoot someone, it is the behavior of the person while dealing with the cop, that would have a person forfeit his life.
In a common sense world the question of guilt or innocence should not even be brought up here, how does anyone not know the rules of engagement with police officers? Here is a PSA that Chris Rock did just a few years ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8
