It's Unconstitutional for the Police to Kill People

[paulpablo]

You didn't see a gun but you can see an ankle holster in some parts of some video clips you can also see what looks like a gun, the police say they recovered the gun and a lab analysis linked Keith Scott to the gun unless you think that was a conspiracy.

That is not what they claimed.... and frankly, just between us, have you ever heard of a "drop-piece"?  http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.ph...op%20Piece


http://fox59.com/2016/09/20/charlotte-po...g-protest/

“The subject got back out of the vehicle armed with a firearm and posed an imminent deadly threat to the officers who subsequently fired their weapon striking the subject,” police said.

That is not apparent from the video, which the chief reluctantly has admitted.  Still, they are sticking to their story.  

I saw nothing in the video that looked like a gun and in the audio all I can hear is cops shouting for handcuffs.  Not one says anything about securing a gun.  My guess is that they didn't plant it until later.

You can see in one of the videos there's an officer in red who stands over a gun shaped object.  It's inbetween both his legs and he stands over it seemingly to prevent it being kicked or moved and to prevent anyone else walking near it.

Also you can see a gun holster in a different clip on Keith Scott's leg.

And this is a person who's already had convictions for carrying a concealed weapon and shooting someone.

The narritive that the left wing right now believe that happened is that this man was just about to turn over a new leaf after having a pretty bad criminal record, he was in the car reading the quran which wasn't found, and he didn't have a gun, which was found and forensically linked to him along with a gun holster on his ankle.
So the police must have shot him, tied a gun holster to his leg then planted the gun while being filmed from various different angles and being watched from various different witnesses.