(October 3, 2016 at 2:25 pm)Drich Wrote:(September 29, 2016 at 7:15 am)Tazzycorn Wrote: The establishment clause is as follows:
To me that reads that any action by a government or governmental body which even indicates that a specific religious idea is privileged over others is prohibited under the constitution. Putting "one nation under god" in the pledge of allegiance or "so help me god" in the naturalisation oath is clearly privileging christianity over other forms of religion and irreligion (giving the idea that the state thinks christianity is true), and having to get dispensation to remove them (as with an affirmation when giving testimony in court) only reinforces this privelege. To be properly constituional in my mind, there should be no reference to god in any document supplied by or statement from or to a state body, unless those documents or statements deal directly with religion (eg a report on the effectiveness of religious organisations in education for example would have to discuss religion in some way).
ahh, no.
to the United States Constitution prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion, impeding the free exercise of religion,
How is restricting the formal declaration of God and country not an impediment of the free exercise of religion?
Are you not petitioning congress to restrict how the practice of Christianity goes down, by mandating the removal of God in the pledge?
How in the fuck does the government maintaining separation of church and state by taking a phrase out of the pledge impeding on your free exercise of religion? How in the fuck does it restrict how anyone practices Christianity?