(October 24, 2016 at 7:11 pm)Mariosep Wrote: Thanks for your presence and participation.
Dear colleagues here, what about you tell me what you want to get started on, first and foremost, and I will see whether it is the logical thing to do.
Here are some things we can get started on which I believe can be logical, otherwise we are not acting rationally:
1. Get to concur on the information on the concept of God, otherwise we are not acting logically because without the same information on the concept of God, we will be talking past our each one's head on different things; if you have objections to this way to get started, please present your objections.
2. Get to know what is existence, because otherwise we will be proving something to exist or not to exist, when we do not know what is existence at all; that is all very irrational. If you have objections against this way of getting started, please bring them forth.
3. Get to know what it is to prove that something exists in objective reality outside and independent of concepts in our mind; that is obvious, otherwise we are again talking about proof, but without knowing what it is we are talking about, because we don't know what it is to prove something to exist in objective reality outside and independent of concepts in our mind. If you have objections to this way of getting started, please present them in your posts.
4. Get to concur that we exist, because there are folks who claim that they don't exist, so they are illogical for posting in this forum at all, as they are contradicting their own conviction, namely, that they don't exist: for how can they not be existing when they are acting, only existing entities can act or be acted on. If you have objections against this way of getting started in my thread here, please present them.
Now, if you have your very own ways of getting started as to be relevant to this thread, please tell us in your posts.
You begin thread asking what we think of your "proof" for your sky fairy. Many of us have already critiqued your argument. Rather than replying to the criticisms of your claims you demand we prove or disprove our gods? Get with the context of your own post and rep!y to the rebuttals.
