It is all right to disagree, but it is more all right that with disagreement, parties to the disagreement agree to expound on their reasons why they disagree, respectively from each side.
So, let dear colleagues here, point out one thing you disagree with me here in this thread, that I am expounding on, namely, how to prove God exists, with first coming to the information of the concept of God, then going into objective reality to search for the evidence of an entity corresponding to the concept of God in our mind.
What do you find disagreeable to you and why?
So, let dear colleagues here, point out one thing you disagree with me here in this thread, that I am expounding on, namely, how to prove God exists, with first coming to the information of the concept of God, then going into objective reality to search for the evidence of an entity corresponding to the concept of God in our mind.
What do you find disagreeable to you and why?
