Mariosep, I surmise that English is not your first language, and that is okay, but it would really help the conversation if you didn't try so hard to "sound smart", using big words and stringing different concepts together. I'm sure you're very intelligent, but your posts are a little confusing because of your attempt to sound smart.
You seem to be asking us to disprove some god which you have defined in your head but you only define as "not the God of the Bible". But "disprove this" is not how logic works. You could, for instance, never give me absolute proof that fairies don't exist, or gnomes, or trolls. You can't go out and gather evidence that something doesn't exist because something that doesn't exist is not there to leave behind evidence. Instead you have to ask for evidence that something does exist. You can't prove non-existence. So there is no proof, logical or otherwise, that there are no gods, which is exactly what one would expect whether any give god(s) existed or did not exist.
Your initial post asked for our opinion on your logical "proof" of some undefined god. The only thing you have defined about that god is that it is not the God of the Bible, yet you are quick to point out that we are wrong in any definition we give for that god. You seem to want an intelligent conversation, yet everything you say leads away from intelligent conversation, whether it be speaking beyond your language skills, telling us that we are arguing against the wrong god when you offer no definition of which god you're talking about or, strangely, proclaiming that circular logic is natural and acceptable, which it is very much not. Circular logic is no logic at all.
Anyway, many of us have answered your original post and told you what we found wrong with your argument. Whether you accept our critiques or not, we have answered you. Strangely, though, you keep changing what the conversation is supposed to be about to the point where none of us really understand what it is you actually want any more. If you could define both the deity in question and what you expect of us in clear language you do not attempt to dress up with too much pleasantry or sophistication perhaps we can give you an answer to whatever the question is you actually want an answer to. At this point I don't think any of us really know what the question is.
You seem to be asking us to disprove some god which you have defined in your head but you only define as "not the God of the Bible". But "disprove this" is not how logic works. You could, for instance, never give me absolute proof that fairies don't exist, or gnomes, or trolls. You can't go out and gather evidence that something doesn't exist because something that doesn't exist is not there to leave behind evidence. Instead you have to ask for evidence that something does exist. You can't prove non-existence. So there is no proof, logical or otherwise, that there are no gods, which is exactly what one would expect whether any give god(s) existed or did not exist.
Your initial post asked for our opinion on your logical "proof" of some undefined god. The only thing you have defined about that god is that it is not the God of the Bible, yet you are quick to point out that we are wrong in any definition we give for that god. You seem to want an intelligent conversation, yet everything you say leads away from intelligent conversation, whether it be speaking beyond your language skills, telling us that we are arguing against the wrong god when you offer no definition of which god you're talking about or, strangely, proclaiming that circular logic is natural and acceptable, which it is very much not. Circular logic is no logic at all.
Anyway, many of us have answered your original post and told you what we found wrong with your argument. Whether you accept our critiques or not, we have answered you. Strangely, though, you keep changing what the conversation is supposed to be about to the point where none of us really understand what it is you actually want any more. If you could define both the deity in question and what you expect of us in clear language you do not attempt to dress up with too much pleasantry or sophistication perhaps we can give you an answer to whatever the question is you actually want an answer to. At this point I don't think any of us really know what the question is.
Have you ever noticed all the drug commercials on TV lately? Why is it the side effects never include penile enlargement or super powers?
Side effects may include super powers or enlarged penis which may become permanent with continued use. Stop taking Killatol immediately and consult your doctor if you experience penis enlargement of more than 3 inches, laser vision, superhuman strength, invulnerability, the ability to explode heads with your mind or time travel. Killatoll is not for everyone, especially those who already have convertibles or vehicles of ridiculous size to supplement penis size.
Side effects may include super powers or enlarged penis which may become permanent with continued use. Stop taking Killatol immediately and consult your doctor if you experience penis enlargement of more than 3 inches, laser vision, superhuman strength, invulnerability, the ability to explode heads with your mind or time travel. Killatoll is not for everyone, especially those who already have convertibles or vehicles of ridiculous size to supplement penis size.
