(October 25, 2016 at 2:09 pm)Napoléon Wrote:(October 25, 2016 at 1:57 pm)LastPoet Wrote: I do not think this even pertains to the matter Napo. The issue here is kids as in persons that haven't fully grasped stuff in the hands of those taking advantage of this situation. Adults may not grasp everything but they can sway a child.
Uh, that's exactly the point of me asking the question.
Quote:There was a conviction of a man that sexually used her 24 y old daughter with severe mental disability sexually. It was not pedophilia, but "abuse of a non consenting adult".
This is the crux of the discussion.
Exactly the point.
Quote:Most pedophiles work within family or close friends. They build up this and manipulate someone that gives trust to them. It is not uncommon to them to listen when parents dont ( teenagers ) only to use that trust for their desires or whatever they do.
I know kids are smart these days, but they lack the experience to deal with an adult advance.
Again, exactly the point.
It's illegal because of ability to give consent. Hence me asking the question, if you had someone who was 14 who could give consent (due to a hypothetical brain transplant), then does it make a difference?
The answer pertains precisely to the matter surely.
When we get to the point of putting a 30 year old mind into a 14 year old body we will have to consider whaterver the fuck you are. Infact, I'd love the ideas. My bones aren't as sturdy as they were back then.