(October 25, 2016 at 9:31 pm)Mariosep Wrote: Dear TheMonster. please don't bring in my assumptions because if any at all they are in my mind, and you cannot presume to read what is in my mind.So basically , you are a tyrannical authoritarian control freak !ike your imaginary sky fairy?
Just tell me what is your information on the concept of God, so that we will get connected in regard to the God I know to exist and you claim to not exist, to discuss whether He exists or not in objective reality outside of concepts in our mind.
From me:
1. Formulate the information of the concept of God, thus:
"God in concept is first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning."
When you have at all any information of the concept of God, then we can exchange thoughts, otherwise you can take my information, so that we can still exchange thoughts.
If you will not allow any information at all of the concept of God to be in your mind, I don't think it is possible at all for us two to talk on whether God exists or not.
Better, dear TheMonster, why not find out whether my assumption corresponds to reality in the objective world outside our mind, by we going together to search for evidence in the reality of existence outside our mind, of God in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.
The way you go about with assumption from my part and therefore you are not going to at least find out whether the assumption can be borne out or not, by us two searching for evidence in the objective reality of existence outside our mind, that is the way to eschew at all any effort from your part to act reasonably, by seeking refuge on the wrong plea of assumption from my part.
Your behavior is similar to your insisting that your friend has no money but only an assumption of having money, but you will not go with him to his home and get to see his money, or to the bank which will tell you he has money in the bank.
Can you at least see that that kind of a behavior is irrational?
In the meantime I am waiting for Asmodee, as he agrees to exchange thoughts with me on whether God exists or not, and I hope we can at least agree to act according to reason and intelligence, instead of throwing up all kinds of walls by which you will not see into reality.
Another wall against seeing reality is the continuous and insistent plea that for being the denier of a claim by the other side, you have no burden at all whatsoever to prove anything at all.
What about thinking on truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas, or just thinking according to reason and intelligence?
Then there is this wall that it is impossible to prove a negative, therefore you don't have to prove anything when you deny something to not exist.
Have you ever thought that there is something very funny to say the least with that kind of a plea?
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
