Just a tip Mariosep, stop trying to make your posts so verbose and get to the point. You're trying to sound erudite but you're failing. You're using words wrongly and making it more time consuming for other people to figure out what you are saying. People just aren't that interested in what you have to say to try wading through a post in the style of a badly written 19th century gothic horror novel.
How do you prove that nose on your face? Well now we're getting to the crux of the matter. Science doesn't work with proofs. It works with evidence. Something that you have completely ignored. We can observe the existence of noses, measure them, make falsifiable and testable hypotheses about the existence of noses. The evidence of noses is so overwhelming that we do not need a proof for their existence.
This is why only theists talk about proofs. Because they have no evidence.
(October 26, 2016 at 3:32 am)Mariosep Wrote: But it just came to my mind that the best way for folks to know what it is to prove something to exist in objective reality outside of concepts in our mind, is for them to try to prove something like the nose in our face, to exist in objective reality outside of concepts in our mind, to prove to a critical audience of readers, so that means they not only prove but must also redact in writing their proof, step by step.
How do you prove that nose on your face? Well now we're getting to the crux of the matter. Science doesn't work with proofs. It works with evidence. Something that you have completely ignored. We can observe the existence of noses, measure them, make falsifiable and testable hypotheses about the existence of noses. The evidence of noses is so overwhelming that we do not need a proof for their existence.
This is why only theists talk about proofs. Because they have no evidence.
