Not every pedophile is a rapist.

[Excited Penguin]

So you think if it's not exclusive or primary(if it's secondary instead) then it's ok/not as much of a problem, and people shouldn't even be called pedophiles for that?

I posted that as an example of why I think a campaign telling people what pedophilia is would be useless.  That was the main point.

I don't agree with the definition I posted though, I didn't even read it as a was copying and pasting it from google.  It was just meant to be used as an example of a definition.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ygrd29-_O3I

Just another one to watch.

It includes that group NAMBLA.  Not the north American Marlon Brando look alikes.   It's the North American Man Boy love association.

It does seem like researchers and experts classify it as pedophilia only when it's exclusive or primary and that popular culture does differently. So I'll reiterate my point, if someone simply finds certain children attractive but doesn't feel sexual urges towards them as they do towards adults, nor does the thought of sexual activities with them appeal to them in reality, then I would 't classify such a person as a pedophile, nor would I have any reason to keep them away from my kids. I am curious if anyone else agrees with this. There are different kinds of attractions, I think, surely, not all of them sexual or worrying in any possible sense.