RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
October 26, 2016 at 7:25 pm
(This post was last modified: October 26, 2016 at 7:29 pm by Simon Moon.)
(October 26, 2016 at 2:59 am)Mariosep Wrote: Now, I appreciate the efforts of the posters here who do not attend to the proof from me but go into digressions with talking flippant utterances.
But several people, including me (see post #44) have responded to your 'proof', and yet here we are, hundreds of posts later, and you have not responded to them.
Your 'proof' is fallacious.
Quote:So, dear readers, let us all sit back and wait with bated breath for the resourceful one poster to set forth the proof of the existence of the nose in his face, in the reality of objective existence outside of concepts in our mind.
Oh please...
If you could provide the same level of evidence for your god as there is for the nose on my face, I would no longer be an atheist.
But what do we get from you, and every other apologist?
Flawed and fallacious philosophical arguments.
Sorry, but no matter how hard you try, you can't 'logic' a god into existence (even if the logic is valid and sound). Sooner or later, the rubber has to hit the road, as it were, and demonstrable and falsifiable evidence has to be provided.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.