(October 26, 2016 at 7:48 pm)Mariosep Wrote: For the rest of posters here who maintain that they don't have any information of the concept of God, since they are atheists, meaning if I am correct, they deny the existence of God, gods, goddesses, deities, divinities, etc., please just choose one of them to give me the information of this one you choose to deny existence to; of course there are many of them according to your self-description of being an atheist, i.e. denying the existence of God, gods, etc.; you see unless you bring up one for us to discuss on whether any
God, gods, etc., at all exist, forgive me but it is irrational to keep on insisting that you don't need to have any information of God, gods, etc.
It has been pointed out to you several times, it is not up to us to describe all the gods we don't believe exist, then discuss, refute, deny said god.
Atheism, at its core, is a response to theistic claims.
It is up to you to proved a description and the evidence for the god YOU believe exists. If it meets its burden of proof, we will accept it.
If we bring up gods we don't believe exist, you will reply with something like, "oh, no wonder you don't believe in god. You have a bad concept of god. I don't believe in that god either".
Also, I reject the concept that I "deny" the existence of gods. This implies that one or more gods exist, but I refuse to believe it.
I do not believe any god exists that has yet been presented to me. So far, none of them has met their burden of proof, including the one you posited in your OP.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.