(October 26, 2016 at 8:16 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(October 26, 2016 at 7:48 pm)Mariosep Wrote: For the rest of posters here who maintain that they don't have any information of the concept of God, since they are atheists, meaning if I am correct, they deny the existence of God, gods, goddesses, deities, divinities, etc., please just choose one of them to give me the information of this one you choose to deny existence to; of course there are many of them according to your self-description of being an atheist, i.e. denying the existence of God, gods, etc.; you see unless you bring up one for us to discuss on whether any God, gods, etc., at all exist, forgive me but it is irrational to keep on insisting that you don't need to have any information of God, gods, etc.
Well, you're the one proclaiming your god exists. Why should I argue against, say, Vishnu when you're do afraid to stand up for your own deity of choice or programming?
If you come in here looking for a discussion and refuse to pick the ground over which you fight, you shouldn't be surprised when no one takes you seriously.
You believe in a god. You want to discuss that belief.
Maybe you should say something about what you really believe, as a Protestant, rather than this namby-pamby bullshit. You appear afrais to actually stake out a point, and I don't think you want to do so. I think you just want to shit and giggle.
Feel free to show me wrong with a little substance.
I won't hold my breath.
And.... there it is again.
A simple request, that has been ignored several times by Mario.
It's almost as if he doesn't understand how this 'logicy' 'debaty' stuff works.

You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.