I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?

[Ravenshire]

The Gentleman B says:

Mariosep Wrote:
   Here, I will give you the link:
   http://www.dlc.fi/%7Eetkirja/dictionary.htm

That page is a steaming pile of bullshit. Very little, if anything, in it relates to atheism."


Dear sir, I encourage you to produce also a dictionary of atheism to represent your best thinking on what is an atheist and how to think as a atheist.

And people will know from your nationality what and now atheists in your country think about what and how to be, to act, to relate to other people, etc., as atheists in your country.

Why in the fuck would I want to put together a dictionary that has a definition of a single word?!? Atheism isn't about anything except not believing in gawd(s).

I see that the atheists of Finland are telling fellow humans like themselves what and how atheists in Finland think, and relate to all the things and ideas and etc. in the world they are a part of and they are a part of mankind; that is why they put all the things in their dictionary of ATHEISM, namely, from the heart and mind and eye of atheists in Finland.

Good for the Finnish in wasting time developing an irrelevant dictionary

Please dear The Gentleman B, I encourage you sincerely to produce also a dictionary of atheism, so that I will consult it to know what is your information on the concept of God, gods, goddesses, deities, divinities, etc., and what it is to prove the existence of something to exist in objective reality outside of concepts in our mind, but of course with the concepts in our mind as the reference platform for our search for evidence on the entity that corresponds to the concept of it, in our mind.

As I said above, atheism is about one thing and one thing only. Not believing in gawd(s)

Otherwise how can any man know what he is denying to exist, as well also what he is certain to be existing, if he does not have any information at all about the concept of the thing men are denying to exist or to not exist?

Would you, for fuck's sake, quit misrepresenting almost every atheist on the planet? Very few atheists flat out deny the existence of gawd(s), yet you keep pounding that drum and it's getting really fucking old.

In general, atheists do not believe in gawd. This is because we've never been presented with anything which convinces us. No compelling arguments, no compelling evidence. Nothing but dusty old books, a bunch assertions and a few allegories thrown in for flavor.

In general, we do not go running around claiming there is no gawd, or gawds do not exist. It's not our thing. Would you please, please, please get that through your thick fucking skull?!?


On second thought, here's your "dictionary of atheism":

"Atheist: Someone who doesn't believe in gawds (including the rare person who actively denies the gawd concept).

Atheism: Not believing in gawd(s)"

There you are. The 100% complete and accurate dictionary of atheism.

Side note:
As part of my user name, it's perfectly ok for you to use the term bastard. Since it's not being used as a slur or an insult in that context it's been stripped of it's taboo.