RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
October 31, 2016 at 1:04 pm
(This post was last modified: October 31, 2016 at 1:09 pm by Mister Agenda.)
MysticKnight Wrote:Mister Agenda Wrote:You have time to go through them with me in detail in PM, but don't have time to repeat yourself in public? How about you just give me an example of the premise you are most confident is true? If you can show me one that bears scrutiny, I'll accommodate your odd request to go to PM where no one but us and the moderators can see our conversation.
So the premise in all this that is argued is "If we have true (objective accurate) existence, then absolute accurate sight that judges who we are in truth is required which can only be God".
If you can accept that much, we can then discuss whether we do have true (objective accurate) existence.
I tried to carve that down to just the premise I asked for. Even then, it's too much.
The premise would be: We have true (objective accurate) existence.
That's the sort of assertion that sounds like it really ought to be a conclusion. Do you mean by it that objective reality really exists? If so, I can work with that and we can proceed to PM if you can resist the temptation to wall of text what should be a single sentence.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.