What do you believe in that hasnt been proven to exist?

[goombah111]

i presented my argument for controlled demolition.

No you didn't, you gave a pdf paper regarding molten steel and said you believe it was controlled demolition.

If that's your case, then there's nothing to assess. The one thing needs to substantiate the other. I could just as easily give a screengrab from Independence Day and say it was aliens.

Connect the dots. Make me believe what you believe.

so if you have no argument then we are done here.

I don't have a dog in this race. I'm not trying to prove anything, so of course I don't have an argument. I'm listening to yours

if you want to make an official stance for both of us, i suggest im for Controlled demolition, and im assuming your for Planes.

you prove planes, ill disprove planes.

ill prove controlled demo, you disprove controlled demo.

Once again, I'm not making a stance, official or otherwise. We have the situation as presented - the official version, if you like - and you are proposing something other than that. Make me see it.

Still, if you want me to prove planes: (image tucked away out of sensitivity)

---

---

Looks like a plane to me.

good job, you proved planes were there. 

now prove that they took down the towers. i can prove that they couldnt, or at least provide evidence to support it.

so are you going to be part of this discussion or not? 

if not, im not gonna sit here talking to myself

---

thats not at all the argument of most theorists.

I didn't present any arguments of any 9/11 crazies (I won't dignify them with the term 'theorists').

Boru

you said something about them not seeing planes...we saw planes, we just dont think they are the sole reason the towers fell.

especially WTC7
especially WTC7
especially WTC7