RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 1, 2016 at 4:26 pm
(This post was last modified: November 1, 2016 at 4:27 pm by Simon Moon.)
(November 1, 2016 at 3:48 pm)Mariosep Wrote: Dear atheist colleagues here, thanks a lot for your presence and contributions to this my thread.
I am attending to you all but not taking you up one by one; my idea of getting to exchange thoughts with one at a time, it does not seem to be working as to obtain the effect of me and my chosen respondent party to exchange thoughts as to get linked, at all.
So, without much ado with replying to your everyone's posting here, and also please, I will not invest time and labor to take up your repeated but unfounded grievances against me, for that will take me away from my purpose in this thread, which is to observe how you think as to comment on my proof for God existing.
If only you also give an example of what and how you prove something to exist in objective reality outside of our mind and the concepts we have in our mind, then I submit you will see the truth, the fact, the logic, and how it my proof has support in the history of ideas with mankind.
I will now transmit this message, and see what reactions I get from you, oh ye atheist colleagues.
The only grievance I think that matters, is your continued avoidance of responding to the refutations of your 'proof' in your OP.
And it started on the very first page of this thread. There are 10 posts on the first page, and half of them contain at least one legitimate refutation of your 'proof'. And where were your responses?
41 pages later, and we are still asking.
Not to mention, that you are just as guilty in derailing your own thread, first by not responding to refutations of your 'proof', then by posting some crappy red herring about proving that we have noses, or that atoms exist.
At this point, it might be best for you to open a thread with your 'proof' in the "Formal Debate' section, and challenging only one person to debate the validity of it. Then you won't have to worry about responding to all of us.
That section is here -
http://atheistforums.org/forum-23.html
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.