RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 1, 2016 at 6:07 pm
(This post was last modified: November 1, 2016 at 6:08 pm by Simon Moon.)
(November 1, 2016 at 5:40 pm)Mariosep Wrote: That is your trouble, dear atheist colleagues here, you keep on complaining that I am not refuting your objections, but I keep on requesting you to present an example of your proving with a write-up step by step, of something to exist in objective reality.
Then you should have opened another thread with that subject.
But what you did was open a thread with a flawed syllogism that does not prove what you are claiming it proves.
We all pointed that out.
But instead of responding to our points, you continue to ignore them.
Quote:The difference between you and me in regard to proof of something to exist, is that I have presented a proof of something to exist, namely, God; but you nothing at all.
No, you provided a flawed argument. You did not offer a proof.
Quote:Anyway, I will wait for your example of a write-up of proof that something exists in objective reality.
Like this way, below, but of course you need not follow my example faithfully, just keep to the core configuration.
Are you seriously trying to equate your 'proof' for a god, with the methods we use to prove things, like atoms, actually exist in reality?!
Quote:What about, which is what I also want to invite you, since several posts from yours truly in recent time, dear atheist colleagues here, namely: for us to work together as to concur on what is causation.
Causation, or causality, is the capacity of one variable to influence another. The first variable may bring the second into existence or may cause the incidence of the second variable to fluctuate.
Causation requires time and space. How did your god cause something to come into existence without time and space?
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.