Dear atheist colleagues thanks for your participation and contribution.
I am only one person not a battalion, it is impossible for me to attend to you each and everyone; that why I always address you all as my atheist colleagues, let you everyone find in my posts what you each one finds in my posts to apply to your each one's expectation.
Earlier I was hoping to be able to exchange with only one poster at a time, that did not work out - because, yes others complained that I was not attending to them; besides the posters I thought I would be on an one on one protocol could not be present to me and I to him or her every instance, when I had posted a message directed to him or her, and the latter to me.
Please try to grasp my idea that when we talk we are using concepts in our mind and making up propositions in our mind, all of them are not any affirmation of the existence of the objects referred to in the concepts and propositions in our mind.
And that is the notice I am giving you all dear atheist colleagues, but it is obvious that you refuse to give your confirmation of concurrence to my idea.
To you it is when we think in our mind we already affirm, and that is a fallacy at least in my appreciation of how humans think and act.
So, let me just say in an expanded fashion:
There is no affirming of any consequent, because I am not making any affirmation of any consequent.
I am telling you already many times that you talk in your mind and I talk in my mind, mind to mind; and when we concur on concepts in our mind, then we go forth into the objective reality of existence outside our minds, to search for evidence of the entity corresponding to the concept of God or more correctly the information of the concept of God in our mind.
The fact is that you don't agree with me on the concept of God, just the concept, there is no affirmation at all at this stage of exchange between us and also with all my atheist colleagues.
That is my constant request to you all, to distinguish between the realm of concepts in our mind and the realm of objective existence outside our mind.
It is what scientists do, they make up concepts and make up propositions, all in their minds, then they go forth into the objective reality of existence outside of concepts and propositions in their minds, to look for evidence; and even wait for centuries for the evidence to appear, in particular when science has invented equipment and instrument by which observation to encounter evidence becomes possible.
Please keep in mind that I am only one person, not a battalion.
I am only one person not a battalion, it is impossible for me to attend to you each and everyone; that why I always address you all as my atheist colleagues, let you everyone find in my posts what you each one finds in my posts to apply to your each one's expectation.
Earlier I was hoping to be able to exchange with only one poster at a time, that did not work out - because, yes others complained that I was not attending to them; besides the posters I thought I would be on an one on one protocol could not be present to me and I to him or her every instance, when I had posted a message directed to him or her, and the latter to me.
Please try to grasp my idea that when we talk we are using concepts in our mind and making up propositions in our mind, all of them are not any affirmation of the existence of the objects referred to in the concepts and propositions in our mind.
And that is the notice I am giving you all dear atheist colleagues, but it is obvious that you refuse to give your confirmation of concurrence to my idea.
To you it is when we think in our mind we already affirm, and that is a fallacy at least in my appreciation of how humans think and act.
So, let me just say in an expanded fashion:
There is no affirming of any consequent, because I am not making any affirmation of any consequent.
I am telling you already many times that you talk in your mind and I talk in my mind, mind to mind; and when we concur on concepts in our mind, then we go forth into the objective reality of existence outside our minds, to search for evidence of the entity corresponding to the concept of God or more correctly the information of the concept of God in our mind.
The fact is that you don't agree with me on the concept of God, just the concept, there is no affirmation at all at this stage of exchange between us and also with all my atheist colleagues.
That is my constant request to you all, to distinguish between the realm of concepts in our mind and the realm of objective existence outside our mind.
It is what scientists do, they make up concepts and make up propositions, all in their minds, then they go forth into the objective reality of existence outside of concepts and propositions in their minds, to look for evidence; and even wait for centuries for the evidence to appear, in particular when science has invented equipment and instrument by which observation to encounter evidence becomes possible.
Please keep in mind that I am only one person, not a battalion.
