You can make a logical argument for any position you want to take.
But just because they seem logical does not make them true.
Say I want to present an argument that unicorns are real.
So:
A unicorn is a horned creature.
There really are many creatures that have horns.
There are reports of the existence of unicorns as fact, they are even mentioned in texts that some people believe as fact i.e. The bible.
Therefore is it unreasonable to suppose that unicorns are now or were a real thing?
So you see anything you want to prove no matter how silly can be argued into existence.
To get real facts you need actual physical proof.
But just because they seem logical does not make them true.
Say I want to present an argument that unicorns are real.
So:
A unicorn is a horned creature.
There really are many creatures that have horns.
There are reports of the existence of unicorns as fact, they are even mentioned in texts that some people believe as fact i.e. The bible.
Therefore is it unreasonable to suppose that unicorns are now or were a real thing?
So you see anything you want to prove no matter how silly can be argued into existence.
To get real facts you need actual physical proof.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
