Mariosep Wrote:Dear atheist colleague Simon Moon, let you and me exchange thoughts, because I stand to learn from your mastery of fallacies.
Now, you say: "This is the fallacy of affirming the consequent. Strike one."
If I may, how did you come to the certainty that I am affirming the consequent, therefore strike one?
He read your 'proof', in which you affirmed the consequent. He illustrated his point with an example to make it easy for you to understand why affirming the consequent is problematic. He made every effort to be clear.
If I may, how were you able to not understand him?
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
