(November 4, 2016 at 5:10 pm)Mariosep Wrote: Dear atheist colleagues here, thanks for your presence and contribution to my thread.
I am still waiting for Simon Moon to show up.
You see, he seems to be systematic in his comments on my proof for God existing, and complains that I do not attend to his refutation.
Now that I am into full time one on one with him, he only posted one message about his idea of me affirming the consequent is from a textbook of his.
After that post which I reacted to, telling him to think for himself and not depend on a textbook, etc., he has not shown up anymore to date.
But I will check again whether I am correct that to date he has not shown up in this thread of mine, to react to my message to him to think for himself instead of depending on a textbook.
Be back after checking again.
No, Simon Moon has not shown up since his last post here, and I told him to do his very own thinking instead of depending on a textbook.
No one else has given comments on my proof for God existing like him, too bad he has not shown up, I guess he is still reading his textbook on how to detect more fallacies in my proof for God existing.
No fallacies, dear Simon when you show up next, it is all in your mind.
You see, dear Simon, it is the most logical thing that when we debate or exchange thoughts on an issue, like for example the existence of God, we first work as to concur on the concept of God; otherwise it is insane at least from the party that insists on not working as to mutually with the other party first come to a bilateral concurred on concept of God, or more correctly, information on the concept of God.
The party refusing to work as to concur bilaterally on the information of the concept of God, is definitely into insane talking or writing, as he is not connected to the other party for refusing to at least propose from his part his information of the concept of the object being debated on.
In any other venue outside a net forum, the audience will just boo him off the stage, because he man is insane, or stubbornly into nonsense.
Now, dear atheist colleagues here, I will think on the feasibility of bringing in the debate over BBC in 1948, between [Lord] Russell and Fr. Copleston, SJ, on the existence of God, we will you atheists and I theist work together to understand how these two very learned and very intelligent persons debate on God's existence.
