(November 12, 2016 at 3:47 am)goombah111 Wrote: im done with you. 90% of the evidence you are requesting is in the video.
put in some minor effort and you might learn something.
Maybe you could present your argument with referencing a 2-hour video? My time is not yours to spend as you see fit.
(November 12, 2016 at 3:47 am)goombah111 Wrote: had you done prior research you would know these answers without the video.
Yeah, and had you done prior research, you'd understand why you're wrong, too. See how easy it is to say that?
(November 12, 2016 at 3:47 am)goombah111 Wrote: i was, for some reason, under the assumption you knew the basics of the theory.
i guess i was wrong. you make a lot of assumptions. try using the scientific method.
lol, you clearly don't have a clue what the scientific method is. Go yammer at someone else if you're done here. It's not like you bring anything to the table except for the odd temper tantrum.
And then you wonder why people think of you as nutters.
*plonk*
