RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 14, 2016 at 11:40 pm
Dear readers here, I am asking Simon Moon to for us to talk about causation, because he is into the intellectually perverse tactics of ascribing to molecules the causation agency of his coming to existence and life, instead of his papa and mama.
Now you see, instead of joining me to work on the proper sense of causation, in regard to his papa and mama being the agents of causation for his coming to existence and life, he said that he is done (with our exchange).
Well, I guess he realizes that he could not anymore continue to engage in the intellectual perversity of distorting language, to avoid the conclusive proof of God existing in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.
Now, dear readers here, I am inviting a poster like Simon Moon, to take over and to continue the present trend, namely, when Simon Moon left, we were or I was inviting him for us to work on the proper sense of the term causation in regard to the sexual causation leading to babies, starting of course with him and me also – we were babies once, coming forth from the sexual causation of our papas and mamas: but he kept on talking about molecules causing him coming to existence and life, instead of his papa and mama.
So, dear atheists here, please one of you, one at a time, accept my invitation to replace Simon Moon.
He is a civil opponent, no foul language from his mouth: so when one of you come forward I have to check your posts here, if you use foul language against me in your up to date posts, then I have to reject you: because your tongue is a giveaway evidence of the kind of heart and mind you nurture, not at all conducive to civil exchange of thoughts, but more at home with, may I use this term, rabbles.
Now you see, instead of joining me to work on the proper sense of causation, in regard to his papa and mama being the agents of causation for his coming to existence and life, he said that he is done (with our exchange).
Well, I guess he realizes that he could not anymore continue to engage in the intellectual perversity of distorting language, to avoid the conclusive proof of God existing in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.
Now, dear readers here, I am inviting a poster like Simon Moon, to take over and to continue the present trend, namely, when Simon Moon left, we were or I was inviting him for us to work on the proper sense of the term causation in regard to the sexual causation leading to babies, starting of course with him and me also – we were babies once, coming forth from the sexual causation of our papas and mamas: but he kept on talking about molecules causing him coming to existence and life, instead of his papa and mama.
So, dear atheists here, please one of you, one at a time, accept my invitation to replace Simon Moon.
He is a civil opponent, no foul language from his mouth: so when one of you come forward I have to check your posts here, if you use foul language against me in your up to date posts, then I have to reject you: because your tongue is a giveaway evidence of the kind of heart and mind you nurture, not at all conducive to civil exchange of thoughts, but more at home with, may I use this term, rabbles.
In an excerpt from #802 Simon Moon Wrote:I'm done.
Your [Mariosep] consistent misunderstanding of what has been communicated to you by various members here, your intellectual dishonesty, and your reliance on invalid logical arguments, has me convinced that you will never get it.
I might check into this thread from time to time, but if I ever post on it again, it will only be to point at you and laugh.
You can go ahead and erroneously take this as a victory if you want. But that will only be more evidence of your intellectual dishonesty.
