RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 17, 2016 at 12:01 am
Okay, dear colleagues here, thanks for your presence and contribution.
I shall now return to my idea that babies are caused by their papas and mamas.
If you atheists deny this, please tell me who or what caused babies.
If you do not deal with babies and their causation, I beg for your indulgence because I will not interact with you.
So, that will be an occasion for readers who care to follow the causation of babies as ultimately leading to the existence of God, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning, the occasion to decide whether to read your posts or not.
For myself, I will opt to save myself time and labor to interact with you at all.
You see, dear readers here, it is my submission that causation is the key to the resolution of the issue God exists or not, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.
Now, in regard to atheists who want to belabor what they claim is already the fallacy of affirming the consequent, I will just not bother with them, because these posters have nothing to do with the objective reality of existence like babies coming forth from the causation of their papas and mamas, except to read textbooks to learn all in their mind and nothing of any connecting with the reality of the existence of babies, to play their mental games of seek the fallacy.
I shall now return to my idea that babies are caused by their papas and mamas.
If you atheists deny this, please tell me who or what caused babies.
If you do not deal with babies and their causation, I beg for your indulgence because I will not interact with you.
So, that will be an occasion for readers who care to follow the causation of babies as ultimately leading to the existence of God, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning, the occasion to decide whether to read your posts or not.
For myself, I will opt to save myself time and labor to interact with you at all.
You see, dear readers here, it is my submission that causation is the key to the resolution of the issue God exists or not, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.
Now, in regard to atheists who want to belabor what they claim is already the fallacy of affirming the consequent, I will just not bother with them, because these posters have nothing to do with the objective reality of existence like babies coming forth from the causation of their papas and mamas, except to read textbooks to learn all in their mind and nothing of any connecting with the reality of the existence of babies, to play their mental games of seek the fallacy.
