RE: If there is a creator, so what?
November 17, 2016 at 7:57 am
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2016 at 7:58 am by robvalue.)
This is at least original. It's the most bizarre definition of "God" I've ever heard. If I was to use a reverse appeal to popularity fallacy, I'd say it must be false because no one else in the world believes it. I'd be interested to know how you came up with it. Or why. At first glance, it appears to be a way of protecting the concept of "God" at all costs by making the definition evidence of its own "existence"; although in what way it actually exists, or does anything at all, I have no idea. I don't know why you even picked the word "God" and didn't make up a new term for it, as it seems to have nothing at all in common with anyone else trying to talk about God, or the entirety of the bible.
It does go to show that the word means absolutely nothing out of context, doesn't it?
It does go to show that the word means absolutely nothing out of context, doesn't it?
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum