RE: If there is a creator, so what?
November 19, 2016 at 6:38 am
(This post was last modified: November 19, 2016 at 6:43 am by robvalue.)
The way that I am me? I honestly don't know how I could care about that. I am me, and I know this (assuming logic works how we think it does). So it would be caring about the law of identity. Sure, I care about that. It's very important. It's an axiomatic assumption that is vital to science and philosophy. We assume it is a law that applies.
If "me being me" is manifested in some other way, or goes through some magical process or whatever, I don't care because it makes no practical difference. I'd be curious to know, but it's not important to me, as a pragmatist. If I can't detect or test it in any way, I ignore it. It's the basis of methodological naturalism.
If "me being me" is manifested in some other way, or goes through some magical process or whatever, I don't care because it makes no practical difference. I'd be curious to know, but it's not important to me, as a pragmatist. If I can't detect or test it in any way, I ignore it. It's the basis of methodological naturalism.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum