RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 21, 2016 at 4:22 pm
Dear readers here, thanks a lot for your presence.
Now, I decided to challenge Stimbo to exchange thoughts with me on God exists or not, because I was thinking that I could learn something from her, on how atheists explain babies coming forth from papa and mama, without causation.
It turns out that she is not interested, so I will resume my exchange with Simon Moon.
Okay, Simon, we were talking about causation, and you are of the idea that you came forth from the material cause of molecules re-arranging themselves, and they thus caused you to come forth to existence and life, not your papa and mama.
And I was asking you whether you use the word cause in its proper sense or tell me, in what sense of the word cause you are using it, when you tell me that you come forth from molecules re-arranging themselves, not from your papa and mama.
From my part, I am of the certainty that your papa and mama caused you to come forth into existence and life.
There, that was where we were when I was waiting for you to resume our talk, because at one point you said that you were done with me, etc...
Okay dear readers, let us all sit back and see what is going to happen, with my readiness to resume my talk with Simon Moon.
The trouble is that Simon takes time to react to me, while in the meantime I think that I could input some ideas in this thread of mine, like that atheists are into raving mad foul language and attacking the person of their debate opponents, because they are in defiance, and also they are in an inner conflict, both of which factors make them resort to raving mad foul language and personal attacks against their debate opponents.
Of course I am talking about what I call and they are now a well conspicuous sub-group of atheists, namely, internet atheists.
Dear readers here, may I just invite you to read my proof for God existing, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning, see ANNEX 2; ANNEX 1 is the post from Stimbo indicating as I read it that she is not accepting my challenge to talk with me on God exists or not, in particular from the evidence of babies coming to existence and life from their papas and mamas,
Of course Stimbo could change her mind, and I am always ready, in which case then I will have to tell Simon to just wait until I am through with Stimbo: you see, dear readers here, Stimbo is a moderator of posts, so she must be a better poster to talk with, that is the assumption from yours truly – only.
ANNEX 1
ANNEX 2
Now, I decided to challenge Stimbo to exchange thoughts with me on God exists or not, because I was thinking that I could learn something from her, on how atheists explain babies coming forth from papa and mama, without causation.
It turns out that she is not interested, so I will resume my exchange with Simon Moon.
Okay, Simon, we were talking about causation, and you are of the idea that you came forth from the material cause of molecules re-arranging themselves, and they thus caused you to come forth to existence and life, not your papa and mama.
And I was asking you whether you use the word cause in its proper sense or tell me, in what sense of the word cause you are using it, when you tell me that you come forth from molecules re-arranging themselves, not from your papa and mama.
From my part, I am of the certainty that your papa and mama caused you to come forth into existence and life.
There, that was where we were when I was waiting for you to resume our talk, because at one point you said that you were done with me, etc...
Okay dear readers, let us all sit back and see what is going to happen, with my readiness to resume my talk with Simon Moon.
The trouble is that Simon takes time to react to me, while in the meantime I think that I could input some ideas in this thread of mine, like that atheists are into raving mad foul language and attacking the person of their debate opponents, because they are in defiance, and also they are in an inner conflict, both of which factors make them resort to raving mad foul language and personal attacks against their debate opponents.
Of course I am talking about what I call and they are now a well conspicuous sub-group of atheists, namely, internet atheists.
Dear readers here, may I just invite you to read my proof for God existing, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning, see ANNEX 2; ANNEX 1 is the post from Stimbo indicating as I read it that she is not accepting my challenge to talk with me on God exists or not, in particular from the evidence of babies coming to existence and life from their papas and mamas,
Of course Stimbo could change her mind, and I am always ready, in which case then I will have to tell Simon to just wait until I am through with Stimbo: you see, dear readers here, Stimbo is a moderator of posts, so she must be a better poster to talk with, that is the assumption from yours truly – only.
ANNEX 1
Quote:Stimbo
Administrator and Prophet-in-residence
#915
RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
1 hour ago (This post was last modified: 1 hour ago by Stimbo.)
_________
To be honest, I never even noticed this "challenge". I usually just skim past this guy's drivel to get to something interesting. And correctly formatted without someone having to kick him up the arse about it.
ANNEX 2
Quote:Mariosep
Joined: 24th October 2016
Reputation: 2
Warning Level: 0%
#1
I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
24th October 2016, 17:27
________________
This is my proof for God existing.
1. Formulate the information of the concept of God, thus:
"God in concept is first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning."
2. Look for instances of causation in reality outside of concepts in our mind.
