RE: How to become a God, in 3 simple steps (absent faith/belief):
November 23, 2016 at 8:40 pm
(This post was last modified: November 23, 2016 at 9:18 pm by ProgrammingGodJordan.)
(November 23, 2016 at 4:13 pm)Primordial Bisque Wrote: Meh, he's confused between the terms 'God' and 'Lead Programmer'.
('A')
It appears you have failed to reduce said passage.
('B')
The aforesaid definition, reduces the traditional deity-bound property sequence, abound scientifically observable probabilities/statistics, such that a particular property is evident — thusly the ability to forge non-trivial intelligence [vis a vis mankind]. Thereafter, said intelligence shall likely exceed the net intelligence of the creator’s(s’) species…whilst separately theist-theorized properties [omniscience, omnipotence etc] likely shan’t obtain, particularly on the horizon of aforesaid observable probabilities/statistics.)
.
.
(November 23, 2016 at 4:08 pm)Astreja Wrote:(November 23, 2016 at 2:20 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Incorrect; unless said teddy bears exceed/equal human performance on a profound degree of cognitive tasks whence said intellect has been programmed by thine.
In the vast scope of the universe, I see "human performance on a profound degree of cognitive tasks" to be utterly insignificant and irrelevant. In a realm of immense time and space, mortals' thoughts both weak and strong are less than a whisper of a heartbeat.
('A')
A quite worthless remark of yours; for God (as predominantly priorly described) is simply properly DEFINABLE/REDEFINED on the horizon of scientifically OBSERVED sequences.
('B')
Separately, the original passage laments of brain based models, that have EXCEEDED said human performance, on certain cognitive tasks/task groups. (Perhaps a rather clear indication that the human intellect is not the boundary on intelligence)
('C')
As such, no degree of the passage creates any acclaim on human intellect.
.
.
(November 23, 2016 at 6:56 pm)purplepurpose Wrote: Thanks for the laugh, Jordan. But seriously, dude, if your serious, visit psychiatrist.
P.S. Do you REALLY need immortality, when you can get so fucking weird being mortal?
('A')
It appears you have misread the passage.
('B')
ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote:God is properly definable as as any likely NON-OMNISCIENT, NON OMNIPOTENT, MORTAL entity with the ability to generate non trivial intelligence).
See medium.com article amidst the original passage, specifying "probably when we are still a mortal species, eg having not yet solved ageing…, we likely become Gods".