RE: How to become a God, in 3 simple steps (absent faith/belief):
November 24, 2016 at 5:03 am
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2016 at 5:06 am by I_am_not_mafia.)
(November 23, 2016 at 12:03 pm)ProgrammingGodJordan Wrote: Conclusion: Mathilda is God-bound, however less-likely so, in comparison to researchers that utilize Deep Neural Networks.
POST SCRIPTUM:
Neural Networks are dynamic, error minimization systems, though it is observable that you express of a separate class of dynamic construct.
I mean these type of dynamical systems, which neural networks can also implement.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamical_system
I have a few questions though.
- After I publish my paper on dynamical systems, I also plan on performing the same experiments with neural networks. Will this promote me back to a being a god rather than a demi-god?
- These won't be the same neural networks used in deep learning systems, they'll be biologically plausible neural networks more similar to what we see happening in the brain. Will this make me more of less god like?
- If using more biologically plausible neural networks make me more god-like, then does this mean that computational neuroscientists are even more god-like than AI programmers?
- Does this mean that researchers in symbolic GOFAI and computational linguists are now our bitches? (please say yes)
- Just to clarify, you did mean God-bound didn't you and not egg-bound, as in constipated from eating too many eggs?
- I thought demi-gods were made when a God appears in the form of a swan and seduces your mother. Does this still work? And does it stack with writing papers on dynamical systems?
