Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 19, 2025, 11:29 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A non-aggressive religion?
#24
RE: A non-aggressive religion?
(November 27, 2016 at 11:15 pm)Aegon Wrote:
(November 27, 2016 at 9:17 pm)Emjay Wrote: If that's the case then imo they're only superficially Buddhists or Buddhism is the lesser influence in some hybrid ideology. Nothing about Buddhism teaches that violence is acceptable, and meditation practice is all about 'not-attachment' to conscious states such as anger... the main cause of violence. Buddhists are fallible just like everyone else but the aim is non-attachment. That said, I don't know anything about how Buddhism is practiced in a religious context. In the western world people who are interested in it basically have to go all in, learning about it and practicing it as a monk would. But in foreign climes if it's the case that there are followers that defer to the monks and basically treat monasteries as churches to go to for guidance, then it might make more sense. In other words, I don't know to what extent the - for want of a better word - peasants in poor Buddhist countries practice the teachings of Buddhism. A monk living in a monastery has time and a peaceful environment to practice meditation all day long if they want, but not everybody has that luxury. So basically what I'm saying is if these mobs you speak of treat Buddhist monks as a higher authority to refer to, but do not actually meditate themselves in the sense of aiming to attain Nirvana... the state of complete non-attachment, then I could understand them not fully understanding the Buddhist message, but if they do meditate and practice it as monks would, I can't see any way that they could consider mob violence acceptable.

Christians and Muslims justify the violence in their respective religions using similar arguments.

Yes, I've realised that point during this discussion; that Buddhism is no different in the divisions it can cause, and the 'No True x' defences it can foster, and which I've just done... all of which can lead to the shit we see in the world. So I apologise; I should not defend it, I should just keep it to myself. It's available to anyone who wants to learn about it but being defensive or evangelical about it is not helpful.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
A non-aggressive religion? - by rado84 - November 24, 2016 at 3:47 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by The Joker - November 24, 2016 at 3:53 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by Chad32 - November 27, 2016 at 9:24 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by Fake Messiah - November 24, 2016 at 4:12 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by robvalue - November 25, 2016 at 2:59 am
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by brewer - November 24, 2016 at 4:23 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by Gawdzilla Sama - November 24, 2016 at 4:26 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by chimp3 - November 24, 2016 at 4:35 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by Silver - November 24, 2016 at 4:39 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by Excited Penguin - November 24, 2016 at 4:40 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by vorlon13 - November 24, 2016 at 5:41 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by BrianSoddingBoru4 - November 25, 2016 at 8:04 am
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by Aegon - November 25, 2016 at 2:22 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by AceBoogie - November 27, 2016 at 3:21 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by Anomalocaris - November 27, 2016 at 4:44 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by emjay - November 27, 2016 at 9:17 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by Aegon - November 27, 2016 at 11:15 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by emjay - November 27, 2016 at 11:51 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by Casca - November 27, 2016 at 8:36 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by Casca - November 27, 2016 at 9:27 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by emjay - November 27, 2016 at 9:50 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by vorlon13 - November 27, 2016 at 10:19 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by emjay - November 27, 2016 at 10:50 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by Angrboda - November 27, 2016 at 11:15 pm
RE: A non-aggressive religion? - by Brian37 - November 28, 2016 at 12:09 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Abiogenesis ("Chemical Evolution"): Did Life come from Non-Life by Pure Chance. Nishant Xavier 55 7238 August 6, 2023 at 5:19 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  British Non-Catholic Historian on Historical Longevity of the Roman Catholic Church. Nishant Xavier 36 4171 August 6, 2023 at 4:48 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Atheists: I have tips of advice why you are a hated non religious dogmatic group inUS Rinni92 13 4490 August 5, 2020 at 3:43 pm
Last Post: Sal
  World War I, religion died in the 20th century, science triumphed in religion in the Interaktive 35 7721 December 24, 2019 at 10:50 am
Last Post: Interaktive
  More than half of the Uk say they are non-religious downbeatplumb 9 3523 September 5, 2017 at 5:04 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
Exclamation new "Cult of 'Non-Beliefism' " aka (the state of being "unlocked") ProgrammingGodJordan 142 25777 January 2, 2017 at 12:02 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  A Non-Religious Person's Meaning in Life and Death AFTT47 17 6194 January 12, 2016 at 12:52 am
Last Post: Whateverist
  A quick way to disprove an aggressive christian TunaDragon28 12 4116 November 28, 2015 at 8:51 am
Last Post: brewer
  Worst Thing Said to You for Being a Non-believer Strider 18 10243 October 12, 2015 at 2:00 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  A Religion for the Non Religious Catholic_Lady 75 21547 July 20, 2015 at 12:21 pm
Last Post: Catholic_Lady



Users browsing this thread: