RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 28, 2016 at 5:42 pm
Dear Jesster, yes, you are my "Your friendly neighborhood heathen," thanks for your reaction.
Now, don't go away, because I like you and me to think on the fact that our papas and mamas brought us into existence and life, by asking ourselves this question:
Is that causation from and by our papas and mamas?
Dear atheist colleagues, please pay serious and continuous attention to the dialogue that will ensue from this invitation by me to Jesster, but see whether she will continue with me.
That is the insurmountable difficulty with ay reasonable and intelligent dialogue with atheists here, they will not sustain a reasonable and intelligent dialogue with me, without lapsing right away or eventually but sooner than later, into raving mad foul language, and then disappear, but later to come back and declare, There has not been any proof of God existing from me, but see the OP, right there at the very start of the thread is the proof - and then later on with my introduction of babies, and now with the insight that "The default status of things in the totality of reality is existence.”
What's the use of repeating with a dialogue now with Jesster if and when she cares to continue with me: BECAUSE inevitabbly they will leave me and the dialogue, but come back later and repeat again their falsehood, that I have not proven God exists, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.
Dear readers, thanks a lot for reading my thread, and tomorrow I will be back, in the meantime I will try to put in some time to research on the psychology of atheists dictating the epistemology of atheists.
And yes, if you newcomers here, have some ideas to take up with me, think whether you will sustain our dialogue because if not, then don't take the dare because you will sooner than later go away, once you realize that you are doomed for not having the truths, the facts, the logic, and the history of ideas with you at all.
Now, don't go away, because I like you and me to think on the fact that our papas and mamas brought us into existence and life, by asking ourselves this question:
Is that causation from and by our papas and mamas?
Dear atheist colleagues, please pay serious and continuous attention to the dialogue that will ensue from this invitation by me to Jesster, but see whether she will continue with me.
That is the insurmountable difficulty with ay reasonable and intelligent dialogue with atheists here, they will not sustain a reasonable and intelligent dialogue with me, without lapsing right away or eventually but sooner than later, into raving mad foul language, and then disappear, but later to come back and declare, There has not been any proof of God existing from me, but see the OP, right there at the very start of the thread is the proof - and then later on with my introduction of babies, and now with the insight that "The default status of things in the totality of reality is existence.”
What's the use of repeating with a dialogue now with Jesster if and when she cares to continue with me: BECAUSE inevitabbly they will leave me and the dialogue, but come back later and repeat again their falsehood, that I have not proven God exists, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.
Dear readers, thanks a lot for reading my thread, and tomorrow I will be back, in the meantime I will try to put in some time to research on the psychology of atheists dictating the epistemology of atheists.
And yes, if you newcomers here, have some ideas to take up with me, think whether you will sustain our dialogue because if not, then don't take the dare because you will sooner than later go away, once you realize that you are doomed for not having the truths, the facts, the logic, and the history of ideas with you at all.
