RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 29, 2016 at 5:35 pm
Dear readers here, I am really happy with my thread: it is very much read by folks visiting this forum.
Yesterday morning the stats were the following:
Number of posts: 981 | number of viewers: 20279
This morning the stats are the following:
Number of posts: 997 | number of viewers: 20696
20696 - 20279 = 417
The figures speak for themselves, that in one day's time there is an increase of 417 viewers for my thread, on God exists.
_________________
This morning. dear Simon Moon, I see your message for me sent prior to my last post yesterday - for I left after sending it that's why I missed Simon's post; Simon is such a civil poster though an atheist, yes it is true there are an exiguous number of civil-tongued atheists in this thread, Simon is one of them exiguous few.
Dear Simon, I have told you that you are good at fallacies all in your brain, with manipulating of words and ideas, but you should dwell in the objective reality of existence, like as with the nose in your face and the fact that even without textbooks on mammalian reproduction, you should know that you came from the causation of your papa and mama, as a newborn baby, a fellow human being, a homo sapiens, literally a man of wisdom, but you have become foolish by taking up with the wrong people, internet atheists.
Here is your message addressed to me, but you forgot to analyze it for any fallacy you in fact have committed; now tell me where is the fallacy from you in it - everyone, you can read it in ANNEX below, and I invite everyone also to seek out the fallacy in it.
Now, dear Simon, do you subscribe to the mindset that atheists are not answerable to mankind to present a decent explanation for why they embrace the self-identity of atheists with such fanatical bigotry, as to have to resort in place of a decent explanation, resort to raving mad foul language and most unseemly insults against theists and against God, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning?
There, when you come back, please do two things for readers of this thread:
1. Point out the fallacy in your message reproduced by me in ANNEX below, and
2. "Now, dear Simon, do you subscribe to the mindset that atheists are not answerable to mankind to present a decent explanation for why they embrace the self-identity of atheists with such fanatical bigotry, as to have to resort in place of a decent explanation, resort to raving mad foul language and most unseemly insults against theists and against God, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning?
ANNEX
Yesterday morning the stats were the following:
Number of posts: 981 | number of viewers: 20279
This morning the stats are the following:
Number of posts: 997 | number of viewers: 20696
20696 - 20279 = 417
The figures speak for themselves, that in one day's time there is an increase of 417 viewers for my thread, on God exists.
_________________
This morning. dear Simon Moon, I see your message for me sent prior to my last post yesterday - for I left after sending it that's why I missed Simon's post; Simon is such a civil poster though an atheist, yes it is true there are an exiguous number of civil-tongued atheists in this thread, Simon is one of them exiguous few.
Dear Simon, I have told you that you are good at fallacies all in your brain, with manipulating of words and ideas, but you should dwell in the objective reality of existence, like as with the nose in your face and the fact that even without textbooks on mammalian reproduction, you should know that you came from the causation of your papa and mama, as a newborn baby, a fellow human being, a homo sapiens, literally a man of wisdom, but you have become foolish by taking up with the wrong people, internet atheists.
Here is your message addressed to me, but you forgot to analyze it for any fallacy you in fact have committed; now tell me where is the fallacy from you in it - everyone, you can read it in ANNEX below, and I invite everyone also to seek out the fallacy in it.
Now, dear Simon, do you subscribe to the mindset that atheists are not answerable to mankind to present a decent explanation for why they embrace the self-identity of atheists with such fanatical bigotry, as to have to resort in place of a decent explanation, resort to raving mad foul language and most unseemly insults against theists and against God, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning?
There, when you come back, please do two things for readers of this thread:
1. Point out the fallacy in your message reproduced by me in ANNEX below, and
2. "Now, dear Simon, do you subscribe to the mindset that atheists are not answerable to mankind to present a decent explanation for why they embrace the self-identity of atheists with such fanatical bigotry, as to have to resort in place of a decent explanation, resort to raving mad foul language and most unseemly insults against theists and against God, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning?
ANNEX
In post #985 Yesterday, 05:26 Simon Moon Wrote:RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
________________
Quote:(Yesterday, 05:08) Mariosep Wrote: "The default status of things in the totality of reality is existence,"
So, if the default state of reality is existence, then why is your god needed?
________________
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
