Prayer ... SERIOUSLY?!

[Statler Waldorf]

---

“one who makes an assertion must assume the responsibility of defending it. If this responsibility or burden of proof is shifted to a critic, the fallacy of appealing to ignorance is committed.” - Michalos, Alex. 1969. Principles of Logic. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. p 370 -

I know you understand this Statler. Please modify your question to be logical or provide the evidence for your claims. we have been going back and forth about fallacies and you havent even tried to modify your question. See Red herring btw ;d

---

I said that we were assuming the Bible was the word of God for the purpose of the discussion, so I have no burden of proof because we are only assuming it for discussion. So I will ask again, if we assumed that scripture is the word of God for the purpose of discussion, how would you prove or disprove this?