I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?

[Mariosep]

Thanks, readers, you have just added some 50 readers to my previous count earlier this morning; so, there are readers coming on and on to read my thread - thanks!

Now, as my previous post has already the recopy of my proof for its Annex, I will not anymore post my proof in this message.

I will just tell you, dear readers, if you care to, you can already collect all my posts here, go to , and you will have all my posts, and thus collect them all and set them up as an encyclopedia of thinking on God exists or not, the affirmative voice.

I was talking about how to prove that there is existence, by telling you that the proof of existence is based on experience of the nose in our face, by touching it your nose and the nose of your family members, friends, etc., all everyone touching their own nose and the nose of everyone else, there that is the evidence founded on experience of the existence of the nose, one instance of the default status of things in the totality of reality which is existence.

Now, I want to propose to you this difficulty, namely:

We prove existence to be the default status of things in the totality of reality, from experience of reality as with the nose in our face, and with a lot of previous posts, of evidence from experience, like babies!

Now, how do we prove the existence of experience?

Because some smart or self-smart atheist might come forth with so shallow a mind as to question that there is circular reasoning, namely, we prove existence from experience, but how do we prove experience, from existence?

Think about that, and tomorrow I will propose to you that the smart, self-smart but altogether shallow completely pseudo thinker, is again into talking all in his mind without ever coming into the existence of objective reality, like the nose in our face, and babies!

See you readers again tomorrow, and welcome to my coffee-shop of a thread in here Atheistforums.org - thanks to you founders, and owners, and operators of this most fairhanded forum.

Oh, I almost forget, don’t you see again that atheists are into pure irrelevancies with their posts, they are totally doomed when it comes to genuine, serious, pure substance thinking on truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas.

When you read a lot of socalled explanation for no God existing, they are into just vacuous analogies to the insult of God, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning.

Recently I read an atheist expounding on ten things why he became an atheist, or why atheists are more rational than theists, and here is one of them:

It goes like this: “Atheists are not angry at God (just as they are not angry at the Tooth Fairy) . . . ”

Or this one: “Calling atheism a religion is like calling baldness a hair color.”

Notice that in this one above, it has nothing to do with God, but with religion – that is always the trouble with them atheists, no capability for mental subtlety, the distinction between God and religion.

Now. who have baldness for a hair color, atheists or people with a religion – paging Wikipedia, time for Wiki to step in for its job with disambiguation.

Tomorrow again, dear readers.

By the way, if you just google the two examples of atheists availing themselves for their vacuity of empty analogy clichés in place of solid substance thinking, try entering these words into google search box: God atheists tooth fairy religion baldness hair color.

Tomorrow again, come to my coffee-shop!