I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?

[Mister Agenda]

Dear atheist colleagues, as usual you complain that I do not attend to your posts, but how can I? As you are talking irrelevancies when not into raving mad foul language, insults on my person, and most horrible blasphemies on God.

Well, you don't attend to serious posts that don't involve disagreeable language, insults to your person, and horrible blasphemies. By ignoring serious replies, you have cultivated the garden you find yourself standing in. A good gardener doesn't blame the soil for producing unwelcome fruit.

Oh ye atheists, I see your demand for evidence for my concept of God, as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning, I see it the only reasonable objection, to wit, the demand for evidence, and I present to you the nose in our face and the babies we procreate, as evidence.

In order to be evidence of your assertion, they have to particularly point towards it. Since they equally point to a natural origin, they do not support your origin story in particular. And you are committing the fallacy of affirming the consequent:

If God, then noses.
Noses, therefore God.

If I am Halle Berry, I am beautiful.
I am beautiful, therefore I am Halle Berry.

Same mistake in both lines of reasoning.

Now, from your part, Oh ye atheists, produce evidence to support the concept of God from Astreja, namely, that in (1) from her concept, she states that "[God is] A god that produces no unique matter/energy signal detectable by modern-day technology…"

Well, I am still waiting for evidence from her and also from you her fellow atheists here.

We detect no unique matter/energy signal of God detectable by modern-day technology. Therefore, if there is a God, it does not produce a unique matter/energy signal detectable by modern-day technology. If God exists, it is a God that does not produce a unique matter/energy signal detectable by modern-day technology, or we would have detected it, since we have modern-day technology.

Now, dear readers here, this morning also I have now in-sighted into why atheists here are into raving mad foul language, insults on my person, and horrible blasphemies on God, instead of talking reason and intelligence to convince me that God does not exist, IT IS BECAUSE they ain't got no evidence and no argument whatsoever, considering that scientists have found that mankind is hard-wired so that God is neuro-psychologically embedded in every blood vessels of mankind's body and in every tissue of mankind's brain.

That we lack evidence of no God is no more noteworthy than that we lack evidence of no leprechaun that forms planets by blowing bubbles. The burden of proof is on the person claiming the leprechaun...or God...exists. Scientists have found that humans have a tendency to anthropomorphize nonliving things and ascribe agency to events whether there is evidence of such or not. That is not the same thing as God being hard-wired. You could make a case that animism is hard-wired, though. Does that make animism true?

So atheists here unconsciously but truly ain't got nothing to bring up except - now listen or read carefully what follows from me: except to try by their kind of blasphemous and sacrilegious exorcism to take out God from their blood vessels and their brain tissues.

You seem to dwell on the posts that are less serious or more insulting. The wolf that wins is the one you feed.