(December 12, 2016 at 11:23 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: For reference, here's AiG's response:
https://answersingenesis.org/dinosaurs/f...-in-amber/
AnswersinGenesis Wrote:We conclude that DIP-V-15103 is a bird, and not a 99-million-year-old theropod dinosaur. This is supported by the discovery of 99-million-year-old bird wings including bones and feathers found by Lida Xing et al. in the same type of Burmese amber as DIP-V-15103.3 I reject the age assigned to these fossils, but it shows that small birds, perhaps juveniles, left evidence of their unquestionably bird-like anatomy in Burmese amber. So where is the evolution?
I'm not a big follower of AIG, but the rest of the article did have some good info as well (if not providing their own tilt to the matter).
The following seems to take a more conservative approach, in that there is speculation in either case (bird or dinosaur tail).
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2016/12/fea...03354.html
While searching, I also found the following interesting, in some of the speculation over feathered dinosaurs, and where information is extrapolated.
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2010/09/inc...38061.html