RE: Is the statement "Claims demand evidence" always true?
December 15, 2016 at 8:06 am
(This post was last modified: December 15, 2016 at 8:11 am by bennyboy.)
(December 15, 2016 at 4:58 am)robvalue Wrote: Also, what we mean by "the book" is very much a macroscopic approximation. The intrinsic and inherent nature of the essence of "the book" is co-dependent on the stellar frequency resistance relationship between what we formally categories as an abstract effigy and the Newtonian microscopic entity which, quantum subplotting notwithstanding, form a bijection betwixt the Euclidian space as quantifiable by Q-theory, and the hollow gamma-pod knowable only by the extrapolation of the internal quad-field into tri-binary space.
LOL you are talking funny. Geometric crayon drawings, or it never happened!