Dinosaur tail found preserved in amber!

[Amarok]

What would be the purpose in responding to points made by people who insist that intelligent design is scientific? ID is neither testable falsifiable nor predictive. It is not a scientific stance, but  a philosophical one.  Credibility nil.

Boru

How did you come to that conclusion?   Tests are preformed, and often in an attempt to falsify the theory. It also makes predictions, such as those verified in the ENCODE project and that convergence will be found to be more common.
I may also point out, that saying it is unfalsifiable is in conflict with a number of people, who seem to believe that it is false.  As well, this would mean that aspects believed under the umbrella of evolution which conflict with I.D. are also unfalsifiable.

I would suggest that you check these things out for yourself, and don't just take my word for it.

Nothing in science supports ID nor can anything falsify it there is always a magical excuse

EVOUTION IS NOT AN UMBRELLA IT"S A WELL DEFINED SINGLE TERM only creationist trying to muddy the waters us such bs tactics