(December 15, 2016 at 12:42 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I don't understand where this comes from. I agree that Science is about method; it is not an entity. I don't think that I said anything to be construed as being against science; if I did, then please point it out, perhaps I can clarify a misunderstanding. I just posted some articles which gave more information.
I think that this is based more on an unjustified and incorrect assumption.
You posted ID garbage. It is not an unjustified and incorrect assumption to say that is not, nor will it ever be, science. If you think it is, you fail to grasp what actually science requires.
In fact, as Tonus pointed out, AIG openly admits that they are not being scientific. They declare with pride that if observation ever contradicts the bible, they will believe that the bible says. That is not using the proper scientific process.
So maybe you're not being hypocritical and cherry-picking what science you'll accept and what you won't. Maybe you just don't understand what constitutes science. Either way you're being foolish.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
