Rwandral Wrote:No they legally can't. Not "consent" as it is understood in legal terms. "Consent" implies a full understanding of the situation and its implication, which none of those groups have (again, having "mental disabilities" defined as above), which is why they cannot give consent.
Weren't you listening? Legality is entirely subjective, and I reject your understanding of consent as you define it. Because switching what country i am in changes not my capacity for agreement
Quote:For the dildo, i'm pretty sure consent isn't an issue, since it's, you know, not alive A dead body, however, even though its not alive, still has limited rights.
Has as many rights as a dildo. That is: none.
Quote:As for "legality is subjective", in my eyes this law aspect is a really accurate and apt explanation of why consent for sex should not be available for animals or children: they do not know all the implications of it, as such they cannot consent to it. To me it just makes a lot of sense, which is why i use it
WHich law?
Oh, obviously not Silicoid law. Much too brutal for little humans.
You don't know all the implications of sex either. Surest way to know you are logically unsound: it just makes sense. State why, or know that the basis is probably flawed
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
