Guys I am not arguing with circular reasoning.
You very well know there must be a path and we learn through being shown.
You know without a path and guidance upon it, there are only misguided ways.
There is nothing unclear in that.
You very well know there is a path, but wish to deny it's source and where it leads to, and the one to guide us through it.
You say you want to be talked to. Suppose you were talked to, this would personal guidance. Where would dialogue with others be upon what is personally revealed to you? A book revealed to all humanity is better, because, we can come and discuss it together. Unite on it. Understand by it. Refer to it. Get a universal language of metaphors and parables that helps us see a certain way.
You very well know there must be a path and we learn through being shown.
You know without a path and guidance upon it, there are only misguided ways.
There is nothing unclear in that.
You very well know there is a path, but wish to deny it's source and where it leads to, and the one to guide us through it.
You say you want to be talked to. Suppose you were talked to, this would personal guidance. Where would dialogue with others be upon what is personally revealed to you? A book revealed to all humanity is better, because, we can come and discuss it together. Unite on it. Understand by it. Refer to it. Get a universal language of metaphors and parables that helps us see a certain way.
