(December 25, 2016 at 8:33 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Guys I am not arguing with circular reasoning.
Like everything else: because you say it doesn't make it so.
Quote:You very well know there must be a path and we learn through being shown.
No I don't.
Quote:You know without a path and guidance upon it, there are only misguided ways.
No I don't.
Quote:There is nothing unclear in that.
Actually, there's nothing clear in that.
Quote:You very well know there is a path, but wish to deny it's source and where it leads to, and the one to guide us through it.
There's nothing clear in that either, whatever it was you were trying to say.
... and please stop telling me what I "know". It's condescending, rude, and horribly ignorant.
Quote:You say you want to be talked to. Suppose you were talked to, this would personal guidance. Where would dialogue with others be upon what is personally revealed to you? A book revealed to all humanity is better, because, we can come and discuss it together. Unite on it. Understand by it. Refer to it. Get a universal language of metaphors and parables that helps us see a certain way.
Which book would that be? Your Quran? The Bible? The Catechism? The Book of Mormon? Bhagavad Gita? The Iliad? The Tanakh?
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.
