@MilesTailsPrower - yes it was an extra word. I've corrected it. Religion is not Faith, faith is faith and religion is religion. I don't define faith the way you do, nor apparently do I define clue as you do. Let me help you. Are you saying that all religion (specifically Christianity) is not based on material proof, and you define "having a clue" as having material proof for something , that anyone who accepts the tern Christian thus has no clue?
@Anymouse- You can have a false premise (or a fallacy) but apply correct logic. An example would be: P1: Most American cats are domestic house cats. P2: Bill is an American cat. Conclusion: Bill is domestic house cat. For an arguement to be true it should be both logical and valid. In this case it is logical but not valid in every case due to the inductive fallacy. It is however logically sound. That was my only real point.
@Anymouse- You can have a false premise (or a fallacy) but apply correct logic. An example would be: P1: Most American cats are domestic house cats. P2: Bill is an American cat. Conclusion: Bill is domestic house cat. For an arguement to be true it should be both logical and valid. In this case it is logical but not valid in every case due to the inductive fallacy. It is however logically sound. That was my only real point.
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
